Hammer
studios were no stranger to sequels. Their sucessful Quatermass film
(1955) had quickly been followed up, and so it was that their most
successful picture to date Curse of Frankenstein (1957) was
followed by a sequel just one year later.
With good
continuity, Revenge of Frankenstein begins exactly where Curse
left off, with Victor Frankenstein (Peter Cushing) being led to the
gallows - but although the guillotine drops, it is not Frankenstein's
head that is severed - he is saved by a fellow prisoner named Karl.
Three years later and a Doctor Stein has set up a surgery in
Hammer's favourite generic middle-Europe town - Carlsbruck. While
treating the rich patients for surely ample fees, he uses these to
subsidise a hospital for the poor of the city - however, Dr. Stein is
hardly being benevolent and it soon becomes apparent that he is using
surgically removed body parts from these patients to continue his
terrible work from the first film. A knowledge hungry young doctor,
Hans Kleve (Francis Matthews), recognises Victor Stein for who he is
and offers to assist him in his work. Stein is proposing to transfer
the brain of his crippled assistant Karl into a new body he has
created - this he does, and with some success - but when Karl
realises that he is destined to become a centre of attention for the
entire medical profession, he goes on the run leaving a trail of
destruction behind him.
For a direct sequel, Revenge of Frankenstein has good continuity, the only alteration made to the story - the legend of Frankenstein and his creation is well known across middle-Europe, while in the first film, Victor struggled to find anyone to believe his story. Apart from that, Revenge works as a sequel, and equally well as a film in its own right - the plot is significantly different to the first film, and indeed to any of the previous Universal Frankenstein films, making it into an original take on the theme. The pacing is slightly slower than the first film but the plot progresses without too much padding, and the exposition is well written into the script. The climax is suitably impressive and tense. On the negative side, Victor's motives are slightly less clear here than in the first film. Although one could generally presume that he was just trying to continue the work until he created a fully functioning creature - he makes a short angry speech threatening the world of science that they could never get rid of him, suggesting that his work is merely to get revenge for his dismissal at the hands of science. A fight scene later on also seems quite gratuitous, as does the film's graveyard opening. As with Curse the film suffered greatly at the hands of the censors. The brain transplanted Karl was originally to develop a taste for human flesh, like that of a brain transplanted chimp before him - however, this subtext was largely removed by the BBFC before the film was even shot.
Terence Fisher directs again, bringing his usual solid mix of fixed and tracking shots and is blessed with a very impressive looking series of sets. Shot just days after Hammer's Horror of Dracula (1958), many of the sets were re-dressed from this film (the entrance stairway and door to Stein's elaborate laboratory is the crypt entrance from Castle Dracula). The film is generally much darker than its predecessor and most of the sets are intentionally poorly lit - although at no time is any of the on-screen action indistinct. Presumably busy on Horror of Dracula at the time, Hammer's lead composer James Bernard is missing from this sequel, instead replaced by occasional composer Leonard Salzedo who gives a decent but largely unnoticed score.
Anyone famous in it? | Peter Cushing - Hammer's biggest name, also played Sherlock Holmes on the BBC Francis Matthews - Frequent Hammer star, also voiced the original Captain Scarlet (1967). |
Directed by anyone interesting? | Terence Fisher - Hammer film mainstay. |
Is it scary? | Not really. |
Any violence? | A vicious fistfight in a lab but most violence offscreen. |
Any sex? | No |
Who is it for? |
Worth seeing if you enjoyed the first film, and can stand alone. Should interest Hammer fans. |
Good soundtrack? | Decent track by Leonard Salzedo, not as good as the first film's. |
Visuals | Original Aspect Ratio - 1.66:1. Anamorphically Enhanced. Colour The picture quality is generally good although there are several scenes affected by flickering, and a lot of speckling in some scenes as well. Never unwatchable though. |
Audio | Original English mono - Dolby Digital - sounds great, no hiss. A German and dub is included. |
Subtitles | English, German, French, Arabic, Czech, Danish, Finnish, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Norweigan, Polish, Swedish, Turkish. |
Run Time | Main Feature: 1hr 26m 17s (PAL) |
Extras | The disc features:
|
Region | Region 2 - PAL |
Other regions? | Identical releases: R1 USA, R2 Germany and Scandinavia and R4 Australia. |
Cuts? | Believed to be fully uncut. Print used is English language. |